Featured Posts

<< >>
Explosions at the Boston Marathon

An explosion at the Boston Marathon

The end of a marathon is a soft target. The scene is always chaotic. Runners are delirious. Friends of the runners are racing about. No one goes through any security; no one searches any bags. There are Gatorade cups strewn about, piles of running gear. People are hyperventilating, crying, celebrating. And today, in Boston, though we don’t know what caused it—an accident, a deliberate act—there was horror. A celebratory gunshot started the race, and then, just over four hours later, two simultaneous explosions near the finish line ended it. They were fifty to one hundred yards apart, according to the Boston police. There were reports of two dead and almost thirty injured but, at a press conference just before five, the police commissioner, Ed Davis, said that he wasn’t ready to give a precise number. He was asked if it looked like terrorism. “We’re not being definitive about this right now,” he said. But he added that people could look at what had happened and “you can reach your own conclusions.” I’ll update this post as we learn more.

The end of the marathon is where one thinks, also, about what a person, and a body, can take—human endurance. The switch to contemplating its vulnerability was sudden and abrupt. “There was blood everywhere, there were victims being carried out on stretchers. I saw someone lose their leg. People are crying, people are confused,” the Boston Globes Steve Silva reported. Other witnesses saw people who had just been running or cheering lying injured on the ground.

 

Up until then, the Boston Marathon had seemed like a joyous event. I ran through Copley Square yesterday morning, just to get a sense of the pre-race euphoria and excitement—and to watch the runners doing their last, final get-the-jitters-out jog. Today, there was a dramatic finish to the men’s race. An American woman came in fourth, as did an American man, one who doesn’t even have a shoe contract. But marathons aren’t about the winners; they are about the rest of the runners. And the worst time for an explosion is at about the four-hour mark, when a new runner seems to cross the line every second. Some of the most terrifying video shows the runners, coming to the finish line, right as the explosions go off.

boston-finish-area-600.jpgThe last major American marathon was also marked by tragedy: Hurricane Sandy led to cancellation of the race in New York. But this is the opposite: a clear day, a race almost finished, and a disaster that, it seems, can’t be attributed to nature. After the news from Boston, the New York Police Department increased security around likely targets; the same happened in Washington, D.C. One has to think we’ll find out what happened. The end of a marathon is a place for photography, and video. Someone, somewhere, will look through the pictures they snapped and see something. We have to hope we’ll figure it out.

Original article can be read on the New Yorker website.

google

Google Person Finder aids people after Boston Marathon Explosion

Google is stepping in to help family and friends of Boston Marathon runners find their loved ones after explosions near the finish line.

The site, called Google Person Finder, allows users to enter the name of a person they’re looking for or enter information about someone who is there.

Cellphone use has been difficult in the Boston area. Phone companies say service is operating, but with heavy traffic.

Far-flung family members and friends are frantically using social media to check on the safety of runners and spectators after two bombs exploded near the finish line of the marathon, killing two and injuring dozens.

Original article can be read over at MyBroadband.co.za

US and China to work together on Cyber Security

China and US to work together on Cyber security

China and the US, which are embroiled in a bitter dispute over hacking, have agreed to set up a cybersecurity working group, US Secretary of State John Kerry said Saturday.

“All of us, every nation, has an interest in protecting its people, protecting its rights, protecting its infrastructure,” he told reporters on a visit to Beijing.

“Cybersecurity affects everybody,” he said. “It affects airplanes in the sky, trains on their tracks, it affects the flow of water through dams, it affects transportation networks, power plants, it affects the financial sector, banks, financial transactions.

“So we are going to work immediately on an accelerated basis on cyber.”

The world’s two largest economies have traded accusations this year over cyber attacks after US research company Mandiant said in February that a Chinese army unit had stolen hundreds of terabytes of data from at least 141 organisations, mostly based in the United States.

China dismissed the report as “groundless”, saying its defence ministry websites were often subjected to hacking attacks originating in the US.

Last month President Barack Obama said cyber threats affecting US firms and infrastructure were increasing and some were “state sponsored”.

That prompted to Beijing to repeat an offer to hold international talks on hacking, with the foreign ministry saying it wanted “constructive dialogue and cooperation with the international community, including the US”.

China’s new premier Li Keqiang last month used his first press conference after taking office to reject the US accusations, saying that Beijing did not support cyber spying and calling China a “major victim of cyber attacks”.

Also last month, Obama signed a spending bill blocking government buying of information technology equipment “produced, manufactured or assembled” by firms “owned, directed or subsidised by the People’s Republic of China”.

Federal government agencies could buy IT products from China if they passed an official assessment of risks involving “cyber-espionage or sabotage associated with the acquisition of such system”, the bill said.

China criticised the bill as “biased”.

The American Chamber of Commerce in China also said two weeks ago that more than a quarter of its members had experienced data theft.

Beijing’s foreign ministry dismissed the report and called on the US to stop “hyping cybersecurity issues”.

A US congressional report last year named China as “the most threatening actor in cyberspace”.

Please pop over to MyBroadband to see the original article. Picture from the Jewish tribune.

Obama on Boston Explosion

The Question of terror: Obama on Boston explosion

President Obama’s statement on the explosions at the Boston Marathon was brief and restrained; he was navigating not just the terrain of violence and loss, as he did in Newtown, but the basic mystery of what had happened. “We don’t yet have all the answers,” he said. “We still do not know who did this or why, and people shouldn’t jump to conclusions before we have all the facts. But, make no mistake, we will get to the bottom of this, and we will find out who did this and we will find out why they did this.” As vague as that was, it was, at least, unambiguous about there being a who—that this wasn’t some freak accident. (The Boston police commissioner, at his first press conference, had said, “Reach your own conclusions.”)

“Terror” wasn’t a word Obama used, either—perhaps because it’s a word that only affixes itself to a crime when we know, as Obama said, who did it, and why. (Some of his staff, CNN reported, had been less cautious.) If so, one should ask whether we are simply driven to apply the label (or leave it off) because of the who, or because of the why. We can talk about whether a lone mad man counts as a terrorist, or how political a crime needs to be to count, or about why we discard other words, like “murderer.” Maybe what matters is that the public life of a city was so compromised. Those are good and complicated questions. What is not right is whether the killers of at least two people in Boston, and the maimers of dozens, who tore apart a crowd, only count as terrorists if they look a certain way, or come from a certain place.

From some perspectives, that “why” comes across as almost radical—there were times, especially after 9/11, when it was brushed away. They hate us; don’t inquire more; it’s wrong to inquire more. But that was never helpful. Even if one’s only impulse is to defend, who wants to shoot in the dark? (There is also the trap of overreaction, and forgetting who we are, thatHendrik Hertzberg writes about.)

“Any responsible individuals, any responsible groups will feel the full weight of justice,” Obama said. In the three minutes or so he was out there, he said the other things he had to: that he had called the Governor of Massachusetts and the Mayor of Boston—“they have every single federal resource necessary”—and members of Congress, and that there were no Democrats or Republicans on days like these. (We’ll see if that is also the case tomorrow.) That the first responders “responded heroically, and continue to do so as we speak.” That a lot of people had been hurt, “some gravely.” That, again, “we are still in the investigative stage”—there would be more briefings. “Boston is a tough and resilient town. So are its people.” He also said, “the American people will say a prayer for Boston tonight.”

Please see the original article at The New Yorker

Boston Marathon Explosions aftermath

Boston explosion and its losses

We have decided to post some of the stories with regards to the 2 explosions that occurred at the Boston Marathon. To see the original article, please visit the webpage of the New Yorker. We feel that this is a serious matter and would like to make searching for news with regards to the matter a bit easier for users, and hence we have decided to post the articles on Technolo.

The bombs that went off near the finish line at this year’s Boston Marathon have so far taken the lives of three people, one of them, reportedly, an eight-year-old boy. More than a hundred and thirty-two people were wounded. CNN offered a count of lost limbs: ten. More than seventeen thousand runners had already crossed the finish line by the time the first bomb exploded; another forty-five hundred runners were stopped: the race was called off. Most everything else has been called off, too, partly out of precaution but mostly owing to heartbreak.

The Boston Marathon started in 1897. It’s held on Patriots’ Day, a Massachusetts state holiday marking the anniversary of the Battles of Lexington and Concord. Patriots’ Day is the kind of holiday that even people who hate holidays love. Runners come from all over the country and all over the world—their flags fly over the finish line—and many of them are raising money for charities. Schools are closed, and reënactors wearing tri-cornered hats tramp all over the place, their woolen cloaks and cowls billowing as they stride. Patriots’ Day used to be the day of the Red Sox home opener, which meant that, if you wanted to see both the game and the Marathon, you were in a pickle. It’s hard to get around the city on Patriots’ Day: the subway cars are packed and the streets are so thronged with people that you can’t even thread your way through them on a bike. The baseball season has since gotten stretched, and Patriots’ Day is now more of a weekend than a day. This year, I went to see the Red Sox play Tampa Bay on Sunday. It was a glorious game. Clay Buchholz nearly pulled off a no-hitter. But the best thing about it was that the stands were filled with marathoners. They wore their official Boston Marathon robin’s-egg-blue track jackets, and everyone clapped them on their backs, and wished them luck.

That night, after the game, I went to Old North Church, in Boston’s North End. (There were marathoners all over the North End, too, eating spaghetti and risotto.) Old North has been holding a lantern ceremony every April since 1875. It commemorates the night, on April 18, 1775, when the church’s sexton risked his life to light two lanterns in the belfry. That signal set Paul Revere off on his ride and, in 1860, inspired Henry Wadsworth Longfellow to sound another alarm, in a poem he wrote on the eve of the Civil War, about how,

…borne on the night-wind of the Past,
Through all our history, to the last,
In the hour of darkness and peril and need,
The people will waken and listen to hear
The hurrying hoof-beats of that steed,
And the midnight message of Paul Revere.

At Old North’s lantern ceremony, a fife-and-drum band plays eighteenth-century music and the church’s vicar, Stephen Ayres, talks about what the lighting of the lanterns means to his church, and to the city, and to the country: they’re beacons of courage. This year, Pam Cross, a Boston television news anchor, read Longfellow’s poem, and I read a letter written by Jane Franklin to her brother Benjamin, about how terrifying it was to hear, from Boston that night and morning, the shooting in Lexington and Concord. “The distress it has ocationed is Past my discription,” she wrote him. Massacre is always beyond the allowance of reason.

I didn’t go into town to watch the Marathon this year. I stayed home to prepare for class. I heard about the bombs while walking to a drug store to buy pens. I was crossing Massachusetts Avenue when the news burst onto my phone—frantic texts about explosions. Head down, heart sinking, I nearly ran into a towering figure in black: a reënactor, Paul Revere on a speckled horse. He was riding to Lexington, a ride forlorn.

Explosions at the Boston Marathon

An explosion at the Boston Marathon

The end of a marathon is a soft target. The scene is always chaotic. Runners are delirious. Friends of the runners are racing about. No one goes through any security; no one searches any bags. There are Gatorade cups strewn about, piles of running gear. People are hyperventilating, crying, celebrating. And today, in Boston, though we don’t know what caused it—an accident, a deliberate act—there was horror. A celebratory gunshot started the race, and then, just over four hours later, two simultaneous explosions near the finish line ended it. They were fifty to one hundred yards apart, according to the Boston police. There were reports of two dead and almost thirty injured but, at a press conference just before five, the police commissioner, Ed Davis, said that he wasn’t ready to give a precise number. He was asked if it looked like terrorism. “We’re not being definitive about this right now,” he said. But he added that people could look at what had happened and “you can reach your own conclusions.” I’ll update this post as we learn more.

The end of the marathon is where one thinks, also, about what a person, and a body, can take—human endurance. The switch to contemplating its vulnerability was sudden and abrupt. “There was blood everywhere, there were victims being carried out on stretchers. I saw someone lose their leg. People are crying, people are confused,” the Boston Globes Steve Silva reported. Other witnesses saw people who had just been running or cheering lying injured on the ground.

 

Up until then, the Boston Marathon had seemed like a joyous event. I ran through Copley Square yesterday morning, just to get a sense of the pre-race euphoria and excitement—and to watch the runners doing their last, final get-the-jitters-out jog. Today, there was a dramatic finish to the men’s race. An American woman came in fourth, as did an American man, one who doesn’t even have a shoe contract. But marathons aren’t about the winners; they are about the rest of the runners. And the worst time for an explosion is at about the four-hour mark, when a new runner seems to cross the line every second. Some of the most terrifying video shows the runners, coming to the finish line, right as the explosions go off.

boston-finish-area-600.jpgThe last major American marathon was also marked by tragedy: Hurricane Sandy led to cancellation of the race in New York. But this is the opposite: a clear day, a race almost finished, and a disaster that, it seems, can’t be attributed to nature. After the news from Boston, the New York Police Department increased security around likely targets; the same happened in Washington, D.C. One has to think we’ll find out what happened. The end of a marathon is a place for photography, and video. Someone, somewhere, will look through the pictures they snapped and see something. We have to hope we’ll figure it out.

Original article can be read on the New Yorker website.

google

Google Person Finder aids people after Boston Marathon Explosion

Google is stepping in to help family and friends of Boston Marathon runners find their loved ones after explosions near the finish line.

The site, called Google Person Finder, allows users to enter the name of a person they’re looking for or enter information about someone who is there.

Cellphone use has been difficult in the Boston area. Phone companies say service is operating, but with heavy traffic.

Far-flung family members and friends are frantically using social media to check on the safety of runners and spectators after two bombs exploded near the finish line of the marathon, killing two and injuring dozens.

Original article can be read over at MyBroadband.co.za

US and China to work together on Cyber Security

China and US to work together on Cyber security

China and the US, which are embroiled in a bitter dispute over hacking, have agreed to set up a cybersecurity working group, US Secretary of State John Kerry said Saturday.

“All of us, every nation, has an interest in protecting its people, protecting its rights, protecting its infrastructure,” he told reporters on a visit to Beijing.

“Cybersecurity affects everybody,” he said. “It affects airplanes in the sky, trains on their tracks, it affects the flow of water through dams, it affects transportation networks, power plants, it affects the financial sector, banks, financial transactions.

“So we are going to work immediately on an accelerated basis on cyber.”

The world’s two largest economies have traded accusations this year over cyber attacks after US research company Mandiant said in February that a Chinese army unit had stolen hundreds of terabytes of data from at least 141 organisations, mostly based in the United States.

China dismissed the report as “groundless”, saying its defence ministry websites were often subjected to hacking attacks originating in the US.

Last month President Barack Obama said cyber threats affecting US firms and infrastructure were increasing and some were “state sponsored”.

That prompted to Beijing to repeat an offer to hold international talks on hacking, with the foreign ministry saying it wanted “constructive dialogue and cooperation with the international community, including the US”.

China’s new premier Li Keqiang last month used his first press conference after taking office to reject the US accusations, saying that Beijing did not support cyber spying and calling China a “major victim of cyber attacks”.

Also last month, Obama signed a spending bill blocking government buying of information technology equipment “produced, manufactured or assembled” by firms “owned, directed or subsidised by the People’s Republic of China”.

Federal government agencies could buy IT products from China if they passed an official assessment of risks involving “cyber-espionage or sabotage associated with the acquisition of such system”, the bill said.

China criticised the bill as “biased”.

The American Chamber of Commerce in China also said two weeks ago that more than a quarter of its members had experienced data theft.

Beijing’s foreign ministry dismissed the report and called on the US to stop “hyping cybersecurity issues”.

A US congressional report last year named China as “the most threatening actor in cyberspace”.

Please pop over to MyBroadband to see the original article. Picture from the Jewish tribune.

Obama on Boston Explosion

The Question of terror: Obama on Boston explosion

President Obama’s statement on the explosions at the Boston Marathon was brief and restrained; he was navigating not just the terrain of violence and loss, as he did in Newtown, but the basic mystery of what had happened. “We don’t yet have all the answers,” he said. “We still do not know who did this or why, and people shouldn’t jump to conclusions before we have all the facts. But, make no mistake, we will get to the bottom of this, and we will find out who did this and we will find out why they did this.” As vague as that was, it was, at least, unambiguous about there being a who—that this wasn’t some freak accident. (The Boston police commissioner, at his first press conference, had said, “Reach your own conclusions.”)

“Terror” wasn’t a word Obama used, either—perhaps because it’s a word that only affixes itself to a crime when we know, as Obama said, who did it, and why. (Some of his staff, CNN reported, had been less cautious.) If so, one should ask whether we are simply driven to apply the label (or leave it off) because of the who, or because of the why. We can talk about whether a lone mad man counts as a terrorist, or how political a crime needs to be to count, or about why we discard other words, like “murderer.” Maybe what matters is that the public life of a city was so compromised. Those are good and complicated questions. What is not right is whether the killers of at least two people in Boston, and the maimers of dozens, who tore apart a crowd, only count as terrorists if they look a certain way, or come from a certain place.

From some perspectives, that “why” comes across as almost radical—there were times, especially after 9/11, when it was brushed away. They hate us; don’t inquire more; it’s wrong to inquire more. But that was never helpful. Even if one’s only impulse is to defend, who wants to shoot in the dark? (There is also the trap of overreaction, and forgetting who we are, thatHendrik Hertzberg writes about.)

“Any responsible individuals, any responsible groups will feel the full weight of justice,” Obama said. In the three minutes or so he was out there, he said the other things he had to: that he had called the Governor of Massachusetts and the Mayor of Boston—“they have every single federal resource necessary”—and members of Congress, and that there were no Democrats or Republicans on days like these. (We’ll see if that is also the case tomorrow.) That the first responders “responded heroically, and continue to do so as we speak.” That a lot of people had been hurt, “some gravely.” That, again, “we are still in the investigative stage”—there would be more briefings. “Boston is a tough and resilient town. So are its people.” He also said, “the American people will say a prayer for Boston tonight.”

Please see the original article at The New Yorker

Boston Marathon Explosions aftermath

Boston explosion and its losses

We have decided to post some of the stories with regards to the 2 explosions that occurred at the Boston Marathon. To see the original article, please visit the webpage of the New Yorker. We feel that this is a serious matter and would like to make searching for news with regards to the matter a bit easier for users, and hence we have decided to post the articles on Technolo.

The bombs that went off near the finish line at this year’s Boston Marathon have so far taken the lives of three people, one of them, reportedly, an eight-year-old boy. More than a hundred and thirty-two people were wounded. CNN offered a count of lost limbs: ten. More than seventeen thousand runners had already crossed the finish line by the time the first bomb exploded; another forty-five hundred runners were stopped: the race was called off. Most everything else has been called off, too, partly out of precaution but mostly owing to heartbreak.

The Boston Marathon started in 1897. It’s held on Patriots’ Day, a Massachusetts state holiday marking the anniversary of the Battles of Lexington and Concord. Patriots’ Day is the kind of holiday that even people who hate holidays love. Runners come from all over the country and all over the world—their flags fly over the finish line—and many of them are raising money for charities. Schools are closed, and reënactors wearing tri-cornered hats tramp all over the place, their woolen cloaks and cowls billowing as they stride. Patriots’ Day used to be the day of the Red Sox home opener, which meant that, if you wanted to see both the game and the Marathon, you were in a pickle. It’s hard to get around the city on Patriots’ Day: the subway cars are packed and the streets are so thronged with people that you can’t even thread your way through them on a bike. The baseball season has since gotten stretched, and Patriots’ Day is now more of a weekend than a day. This year, I went to see the Red Sox play Tampa Bay on Sunday. It was a glorious game. Clay Buchholz nearly pulled off a no-hitter. But the best thing about it was that the stands were filled with marathoners. They wore their official Boston Marathon robin’s-egg-blue track jackets, and everyone clapped them on their backs, and wished them luck.

That night, after the game, I went to Old North Church, in Boston’s North End. (There were marathoners all over the North End, too, eating spaghetti and risotto.) Old North has been holding a lantern ceremony every April since 1875. It commemorates the night, on April 18, 1775, when the church’s sexton risked his life to light two lanterns in the belfry. That signal set Paul Revere off on his ride and, in 1860, inspired Henry Wadsworth Longfellow to sound another alarm, in a poem he wrote on the eve of the Civil War, about how,

…borne on the night-wind of the Past,
Through all our history, to the last,
In the hour of darkness and peril and need,
The people will waken and listen to hear
The hurrying hoof-beats of that steed,
And the midnight message of Paul Revere.

At Old North’s lantern ceremony, a fife-and-drum band plays eighteenth-century music and the church’s vicar, Stephen Ayres, talks about what the lighting of the lanterns means to his church, and to the city, and to the country: they’re beacons of courage. This year, Pam Cross, a Boston television news anchor, read Longfellow’s poem, and I read a letter written by Jane Franklin to her brother Benjamin, about how terrifying it was to hear, from Boston that night and morning, the shooting in Lexington and Concord. “The distress it has ocationed is Past my discription,” she wrote him. Massacre is always beyond the allowance of reason.

I didn’t go into town to watch the Marathon this year. I stayed home to prepare for class. I heard about the bombs while walking to a drug store to buy pens. I was crossing Massachusetts Avenue when the news burst onto my phone—frantic texts about explosions. Head down, heart sinking, I nearly ran into a towering figure in black: a reënactor, Paul Revere on a speckled horse. He was riding to Lexington, a ride forlorn.

Chaos after the Boston marathon explosion

After the Boston Marathon explosion

We have decided to post some of the stories with regards to the 2 explosions that occurred at the Boston Marathon. To see the original article, please visit the webpage of the New Yorker.

At the corner of Clarendon Street and Stuart Street, near Copley Square, a woman screamed the name Lisa at intervals, panic on her face as she walked back and forth. Runners, many wrapped in the thin space blankets provided by Boston Marathon officials at the finish line of a race that had ended with two explosions, stood shaking from some combination of runners’ fatigue and shock at what they had heard or seen, or at the bits of news that were passing through the crowd. Some were joined by family members or friends. Some were hugging. Others cried. Many in the crowd stared down at the phones in their hands, trying to make sense of conflicting reports.

A man stood wrapped in a space blanket, shivering, his eyes wide. He had salt caked on his face and neck. Jamie Hoag, who is from Washington, D.C., and grew up outside of Boston, said he was on Boylston Street, just a hundred feet away from finishing his first Boston Marathon—his first marathon of any kind. “An explosion occurred on the left side of the finish line,” he said. “I stopped and just froze—it was an intense explosion. And then a second explosion happened over my left shoulder, about fifty feet away. Pandemonium started breaking out. People started trying to jump over the barriers. The police yelled, ‘It’s an explosion.’ And then they started getting people out of there as fast as possible.”

“The first one, I felt it,” he said. “I thought it was a pyrotechnic display that went afoul. But when I heard the second one, that’s when I realized something was wrong.”

Hoag was standing alone.

“I’m just waiting for my partner, my sister, and my very good friend, who were supposed to be waiting for me at the finish line. I’m just waiting for them. I told them that we’d meet here, at this family meeting area. I’m just hoping, with the chaos, that they haven’t been able to get through yet.” Cell phones weren’t working well, and the police didn’t want people using them, in case that’s what would set off a remote explosion.

The woman’s voice called out the name Lisa once again.

Siobhan McCormick, a woman with grey hair under a running cap, stood at the corner. She had tears in her eyes. She had been finished for just five minutes when she heard what “she thought was a cannon.”

“I turned around and saw smoke,” she said. “And then a second one went off near the stands. We were then sent to the buses waiting for our gear—a kind of wave of terror moved through the crowd, and then it calmed down again and we were moved away.”

McCormick, who had travelled from Vancouver, British Columbia, for the race, said she couldn’t quite remember the specifics of the explosion. “I was hysterical after finishing a marathon,” she explained.

After I spoke to McCormick, there was a loud sound, which seemed to come from the other side of Copley Square, and the crowd began to move around uneasily. It was a little after four. It may have been a controlled detonation by the police (it was reported that there was at least one). Or maybe it was just the sound of something heavy being dropped—a normal city sound. Runners and others remained in the area, though some people began moving away.

I walked south from Copley next to a young marathoner with his face painted red and gold. His name was Ken Bereski, from Miami, and he’d just finished his twelfth Boston Marathon.

“I crossed the finish about two minutes before they went off,” Bereski said. (“I’m counting my blessings right now that I finished two minutes ahead of where I was hoping to finish,” he added later.) “I was still in the chute, just down by the water. I didn’t see anything. I heard the explosions loud and clear…. After the first one, people just shook it off. Then there was a second one. That’s when everyone, myself included, realized something wasn’t right.”

He continued, “They started pushing everyone to get out of the finish chute area. Props to the volunteers, they managed to even keep that under control. It wasn’t a mad house. People were obviously rushing, but it was under control. People were clearly distraught. People who were just behind me rushed by and they actually saw what happened. People near me were talking about lost limbs.”

In the South End, less than half a mile from Copley Square—where, on a normal Marathon Monday, runners often go to meet family members, grab some food, and raise a celebratory beer—people walked around in silent groups, eyes cast down to their phones. Logan Airport had been shut down. The afternoon had turned cool in the shadows, but there was still a bright-blue sky, just as it had been at the start of what had seemed a perfect day for the marathon. A pizza place was packed with runners, all clad in yellow Boston Marathon gear. They all stared up at a flat-screen television tuned to a local news channel. The station was replaying video of explosions from the finish line. The crawl at the bottom said: “2 PEOPLE DEAD.”

twitter-music

Twitter music is here, but you can’t use it..

Want to play with Twitter’s new music app? You can get it today — if you’re really famous.

If not, you’re going to have to wait a week.

Want to play with Twitter’s new music app? You can get it today — if you’re really famous.

If not, you’re going to have to wait a week.

Here’s the deal: As we wrote yesterday, Twitter is launching its new music discovery app for iOS devices, timed to the start of the Coachella music festival this weekend.

But for now, only a handful of “influencers” are going to get their hands on it.

That’s why Ryan Seacrest was tweeting about the app yesterday.* And that’s why sources say you should expect to see dozens of other celebrities chatting it up over the next few days.

And you, non-famous person with an iPhone? Hang tight for a week.

So that helps explain why we heard contradicting reports about the app’s launch date (Today! This weekend!) yesterday. (They were both right! Sort of.)

And as long as the celebrities don’t spend their time tweeting about how much they dislike the app, it will be a smart move by the Twitter folks: They get to stoke demand and do some last-minute bug-testing** at the same time.

* This is not the first time a big Web company has used Ryan Seacrest in a faux-stealth app marketing push. Apparently it worked well for Zynga, too.

** This might have been helpful for the Vine launch earlier this year.

View the original article at AllThingsD written by Peter Kafka. Image from WaltRibeiro.com.

3D Printed Guns

Meet the “Crypto Anarchist” who wants everyone to print their own guns!

A fascinating documentary looks at how the Internet and 3D printing complicate the gun control debate.

Just because you have the ability to 3D print guns, doesn’t, of course, mean that you have to. But — law of large numbers — somebody is going to. And that somebody isn’t just going to print their own guns, but they’re going to make it their cause, and devote their time and energy to making sure other people can too. That person, in America today, is 25-year-old Cody R. Wilson.

Motherboard‘s excellent documentary, above, has given us a deep dive into the mind of this person – his political beliefs, his hopes, the ideologies he seeks to undo. What you see is someone who is deeply engaged in the ideas behind his project; someone who isn’t just making, but who sees his creations as political acts, as arguments. He directly says: “We’re trying to prove a point.”

“The only things recognized and promulgated in this culture are the kinds irreversible things — progress, growth,” he explains in the video. “To have a symbolic gift like the printable gun, does so much ideological damage and violence to these ideas. You hear these progressives talk all the time about the wrong side of history, like, somehow we’re going to get to some result, and it’s all going to be whole and good. And we say no, here’s an element of reversibility and there’s nothing you can do about it.”

But guns, after all, aren’t just political statements, an exercise in freedom. Eventually — law of large numbers again — somebody out there is going to take one of these computer files and print something that they use to end somebody’s life. What, I want to know, does Wilson think about that? Either those quotes lie on Motherboard’s digital equivalent of a cutting-room floor, or that’s just not something Wilson has thought very much about.

Here is the Documentary titled “3D Printed Guns”

3D Printed Guns

Just click the link and it will open the video on Youtube. I will also get the video embedded into the site soon so you can watch directly from Technolo if you like :)

“3D Printed Guns” was produced by Erin Lee Car for Motherboard. For more videos, visit http://motherboard.vice.com/.

This article was written by Rebecca J. Rosen and the original article will be found at The Atlantic.

Now this I would definitely like to hear your views on peeps! Technology is growing to a point now where we are definitely losing control of it, and with guns being a difficult thing to control in the first place, could this make matters worse??

CareerBliss

Happiest Tech companies in America

Tech companies are already well known for some of the extra benefits they offer their employees, but several companies stand head and shoulders above others in keeping their workers happy, a new poll has found.

The survey, based on reviews on the site CareerBliss, ranked and rated the happiest tech companies in the United States.

The survey, based on reviews on the site CareerBliss, ranked and rated the happiest tech companies in the United States.Overall, workers at Intuit were found to be the happiest employees in tech. Texas Instruments (No. 2) and Avaya (No. 3) rounded out the top three.

Employees at Google — which is often recognized for its comprehensive benefits package that includes everything from free food and haircuts to on-site doctors and fitness centers — were rated the fourth happiest workers in tech. EMC Corp and Intel followed Google on the CareerBliss list, at No. 5 and No. 6, respectively. The rest of the top-10 list included Unisys, Yahoo!, HCL Technologies and Advanced Micro Devices.

Heidi Golledge, CEO and co-founder of CareerBliss, said the findings highlight the importance of company culture in keeping workers happy.

“When it comes to happy tech companies, factors such as one’s relationship with their peers and their company’s culture have the greatest influence on overall happiness,” said Golledge. ”Employees at Intuit rated company culture and the work they do as key factors in their overall happiness.”

The survey also found that tech-company employees do not place as much value on salary as a factor influencing their happiness.

“CareerBliss also found salary was not a huge factor in determining employee satisfaction,” Golledge said. “For example, Yahoo, which ranked eighth on our list, has one of the highest average salary listings — $87,000 a year, whereas Intuit’s average salary is $77,000 a year — once again proving money does not necessarily buy happiness at work. When it comes to tech, folks feel happy creating the latest technology and being part of a cool culture with friends at work.”

Give us your thoughts and comments peeps…. I’d be interested to know what the best tech companies to work for in South Africa are… perhaps that will be my next news article!

CareerBliss

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original article can be found at BusinessNewsDaily

wikileaks

Navy SEAL from Bin Laden capture to testify against Bradley Manning

The judge presiding over the Bradley Manning court-martial case ruled in a pre-trial hearing Wednesday that a member of the secretive team that raided the Osama Bin Laden compound in Abbottabad will be allowed as a witness in court

The judge presiding over the Bradley Manning court-martial case ruled in a pre-trial hearing Wednesday that a member of the secretive team that raided the Osama Bin Laden compound in Abbottabad will be allowed as a witness in court. He will testify to prove that Manning willingly “aided the enemy” when he leaked more than 700,000 documents and other materials toWikiLeaks.

Judge Col. Denise Lind’s ruling paved the way for the member of the Navy SEAL Team 6 to appear in court. The government wants him to testify that after shooting Bin Laden in his compound, the team found files and documents containing WikiLeaks material, which were specifically requested by the former al-Qaeda leader, according to several reports from Fort Meade, MD.

His potential appearance is part of the prosecution’s strategy to prove that Manning willingly “aided the enemy” — the higher of the 22 charges he still faces after pleading guilty to 10 of the lesser ones.

To be found guilty of that, however, the judge also said the government will have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Manning had “reason to believe” that leaking thousands of diplomatic cables and war logs to Julian Assange’s organization would harm the United States and be helpful to some of its enemies. The judge said this kind of crime can’t be committed inadvertently or accidentally. This decision raises the burden of proof for the government.

If found guilty, the former military analyst faces life in prison.

The member of the SEAL team will be known as “John Doe” and will testify in a closed session in which no media or public will be allowed, to protect his identity. He will also be able to attend in civilian clothes and a “light disguise” at a different location where the evidence gathered at Bin Laden’s compound will be presented.

The government will call three other classified witnesses and 24 additional witnesses, including army and navy chiefs, officials from the defense and state department, as well as CIA and FBI intelligence experts.

The judge addressed the issue of secrecy in general as well, stressing the need to protect state secrets and balancing that with the need to hold a public trial, which “inspire public confidence that the accused has been fairly dealt with and not unfairly condemned, they encourage witnesses to come forward and discourage perjury,” she said, according to The Guardian.

Manning’s trial is set to begin June 3 and will probably last 12 weeks, the judge said.

This article courtesy of Mashable.com. Image courtesy of EmpireStrikesBlack.com.

Please leave your thoughts and comments guys…. For those of you that were active on the old Technolo site, you know we had quite a few articles with regards to Anonymous and Wikileaks… I will be restoring those again soon. But for now I will be bringing you more current news from the web. Until next time ;)